Three articles by Andrea Giotti
1. Prohibited Technology.
An article by Andrea Giotti, 12 August 2011.
Adapted and translated by Rudy Andria with the author’s permission.
The subject-matter of mind control of single individuals from unspecified agencies is often the object
of skepticism from the general public, in so far as official science only takes into consideration the
somewhat limited manipulation techniques such as hypnosis, subliminal messages and so on.
Moreover, it is well-known that the last century history had several secret projects, at least at the time
they were created, which account for the constant interest on this topic from major governments and
their secret services.
A case in point is the particularly well-known CIA MKULTRA Project but the Soviets also carried out
several experiments in this regard and there is no secret service in the world which does not know how
to recognize or worse, how to cause a psychological block to a troublesome witness. The results of the
experiments conducted within the framework of such projects have almost never been made known to
the general public in their entirety, as the mind control technique that enables their development is a
terrible weapon against individual freedom and a person who owns one wants to keep its monopoly.
“Brain washing”, the creation of “Manchurian candidates” and such like are not topics meant to appear
in the texts of psychology or in newspaper articles. Nevertheless, they can be terribly real and arouse
legitimate suspicions in the minds of those who are asking questions on the disturbing facts of recent
history, like the murder of President Kennedy, or news items like the last mass massacres perpetrated
by alleged unbalanced people in the world.
Writing about these topics is to some extent difficult, because the sources are often doubtful, witnesses
are reluctant or unreliable and the few documents available are full of omissions. As difficult as it may
be, it is also legitimate to try to inform the public about the possibility that similar techniques are
commonly used, without revealing the details that make it possible to implement these techniques but
revealing enough to allow people to recognize them and, where possible, to defend against them.
Quoting sources within the structures that are more familiar with them, namely the secret services, is
virtually impossible without incurring unpleasant incidents. However, I was able to directly experience
the most sophisticated of these techniques. Thus, on the basis of this experience, I have written this
article. To report is not to prove and as a matter of fact, there is no mention of the documentary
evidence of what is reported below. In any case, a similar piece of information is worth something,
since it may raise doubts in broader minds and prepare the readers to face, in a more conscious and less
passive way, the new order which is taking shape in the world.
“Mind reading” was also the object of much research in both civilian and military spheres, over the past
century, especially with the Soviets. Such research has always been unsuccessful, until the new
millennium. However, for at least a decade, the so-called “artificial telepathy” was secretly developed
by the NSA or other U.S. government agencies. This is a technology that remotely allows a two-way
communication between a suitable device, controlled by an operator, and human brain. It also allows a
connection interface with all the human nervous system, from considerable distances via protections of
different types. This is possible, perhaps through a satellite-network which can provide global
coverage. Given an initial analysis, it does not seem that there are technological protections, able to
protect the targeted victim. An even more disturbing detail is this technology being also used to torture
and kill individuals remotely, without a trace.
Readers with scientific background will remain extremely perplexed in the face of such progress. It is
therefore appropriate to specify immediately that such technology is based on some radical
developments, both in the field of physics and in that of neuroscience, which seem incredible to official
science and common sense. Writing and especially reading cortical currents at a distance, and also
interpreting them in terms of words and images, appears as an achievement so far advanced from the
commonly recognized state of the art, yes, so far advanced as to amaze any industry expert. However,
the goal has been achieved. This most likely occurred through the discovery of a new carrier for
physical interaction of wave or particle beams unknown or already known but not officially used for
practical purposes. This interaction carrier has characteristics of greater distance, penetration and
precision never seen before. With this, it was then possible to investigate in detail the functioning of
Like any real technology, fortunately enough, it also has some important limitations. Above all, it does
not directly target the victim’s thoughts nor does it control body movements, but it only interferes with
both, mainly through psychological manipulation, sleep deprivation and pain induction. The operator
who controls the device can project his voice in the mind of the victim to manipulate him/her and to
induce him or her to have a Manchurian candidate-like behaviour, but the manipulation techniques used
are generally traditional and it is possible to oppose against them the same resistance that would be
opposed to a flesh-and-blood interlocutor. Moreover, mind reading is limited to verbal or “superficial”
thoughts, namely, what we express through words. It is also limited to a few non-verbal or “deep”
thoughts and to the mental images that we visualize. However, most non-verbal thoughts and memories
stored in our brains apparently, cannot be accessed yet from the outside or not yet decipherable through
The physical effects that the operator can cause to the victim range between the projection of false
sensory inputs of visual, auditory and tactile nature to the interference directed into the neurovegetative
system with high probability of death, due to cardiac or respiratory arrest, for example. False sensory
inputs can, with relative ease, be identified as disturbances and are consequently ignored.
This technology is used today to constantly monitor specific key figures in the political, scientific,
military and media world, as well as to perform covert psychological operations, wherever it is needed.
It puts in a state of submission those who become aware of similar reality. For example, blackmailing
them through reading their thoughts. Opponents are then forced into a program of social, psychological
and finally physical discredit and destruction which typically ends with inducing the victim to suicide,
with a fatal accident caused artificially or with a natural-looking death . From the outside, they simply
appear as cases of insanity, since in psychiatry, the mere perception of a voice is considered a sufficient
symptom for specific diagnosis. The goal, needless to say, is to impose an absolute domination of the
world. But sometimes, unlike what happened at the time of Hitler or Stalin, there is a way to reach it
through a devious and sneaky global coup, unbeknownst to the general public. The agency which holds
the monopoly of this instrument does not wish others to develop another one, even with very little
similarity. It is then very likely that the figures who are in a position to do it, particularly scientists,
would face the same type of opponents, with all those who are able to oppose some more traditional
forms of resistance like nuclear retaliation in case of war.
Before putting the blame on the U.S. President, however, it is appropriate to remember that this
technology provides the person who directly handles it a power which is big enough to enable him to
break free from the control of any higher authority. So even the politicians, scientists, soldiers and
journalists in the United States are not spared by the treatment described above. Without going into
details which would require many more pages of writing, it should be noted that the story of the attack
on the Twin Towers and various other facts of the Italian and international chronicles may need to be
rewritten in the light of the existence of this “prohibited technology”. My opinion is that the power
which this technology confers on humanity is so huge as to inevitably corrupt whoever owns it and thus
drag the future world into chaos.
2. Reverse engineering of a remote mind control system.
An article by Andrea Giotti, 16 March 2012.
Adapted and translated by Rudy Andria with the author’s permission.
However much mind control technologies could be the fruit of years of secret research and
consequently, turn out to be prohibited for the common man, proving its existence ends up becoming
almost a moral duty to those who are aware of it. Therefore, a methodological error is not held
responsible, if the study from which the present article originates, is based on data collected from not
reproducible personal experiences, and correlated with each other in the light of a literature which is
not universally recognized.
In particular, the existence of “artificial telepathy” requires a scientific explanation, by each and every
broader mind. And an erroneous explanation is better than no explanation at all. At worst, this study can
be considered an illustrative example of the device described in the article “Prohibited Technology”,
but at best, it is the technology itself that is partially revealed here, thanks to the patient work of reverse
To sum it up, some significant progress in the field of physics is a prerequisite for a more in-depth
understanding of the mind, which is in turn, required to implement “artificial telepathy” in its current
form. From the evil psychology of “black ops” then comes the use of “artificial telepathy” as a remote
mind control means.
The current working hypothesis is that the technological support of “artificial telepathy” is a satellite
man-machine interface, a hypothesis which is formulated after testing a wide geographical coverage of
the phenomenon. Its nature is not paranormal but stems from the control of a new carrier of physical
interaction, on which a further assumption is made. Other hypotheses, more appropriate to explain the
phenomenon are likely to follow and this article is to be considered only as a first attempt to dispel the
fog that surrounds it.
The structural and functional analysis of the available information has produced a framework that can
be summarized in the following diagram.
Visione esterna External vision/view
Pensieri verbali Verbal thoughts
Pensieri primitivi Primitive thoughts
Immagini mentali Mental images
Stato neuromuscolare Neuromuscular state
Stato neurovegetativo Neurovegetative state
Dolore e piacere Pain and pleasure
Onde EM Electromagnetic waves
Atomi muonici Muonic atoms
The operators that control the “telepathic” communication channel in real time, are lying on the ground
behind a traditional interface similar to the one shown above. The blue modules are meant for reading,
and the red ones for writing. These modules rely on other subsystems distributed along a satellite
network and the individual satellites are connected to the control station via conventional
communication channels, with electromagnetic waves as the carrier of the signals. In turn, the network
is interfaced with the target’s neural currents through a new carrier of physical interaction made up of
known particles, but not yet formally exploited for practical purposes.
The brain and nervous system of the target can thus be reached for reading and writing by the
operators, which can be based on the reading results and so, apply to writing a strategy of
psychological control of the target. This satellite man-machine interface is thus classified as a weapon
system, which violates the most basic human rights, as described in the article “Ten reasons to fight the
New World Order.”
A transcoding process makes representations of signals corresponding to the target’s thoughts, his
sensory data and his global neural state available to operators, by filtering the results of neuroimaging.
The reverse process allows them to interfere with most of these signals by steering a neurostimulation.
The corresponding two subsystems respectively carry out the remote reading and writing of the neural
current . The actual capacity of the transcoding process depends on the interface module concerned, but
typically, reading appears to be more advanced than writing.
The interface modules listed in the diagram represent an underestimation of those present and were
derived from the data collected, and also through tests on the “telepathic” channel. The system also
allows for a remote external viewing of the target, and also tracking, with the sub-systems, which are
fed back due to the active nature of the reading process. This allows the “telepathic” channel to also
work in a non-consensual way, with the fleeing or safely locked in target.
To describe the interface between the satellite network and the target, it is necessary to make an
assumption, called “lepton”, on the new physical interaction carrier. With this assumption,
neurostimulation is performed through a satellite, which produces muons and projects them into a beam
concentrated on the target, which causes the formation of muonic atoms in neurons. These atoms
interfere with the normal electrochemical activity of the nerve impulses, to the point of allowing the
superimposition of an external signal with the proper modulation.
Due to the muon decay linked to muonic atoms, the target also produces some widely spread emission
of neutrinos detected by other satellites. The respective measurements of neutrino fluxes are compared,
so as to allow either a neuroimaging of the target or his external viewing, which, in turn, is used to
target the area of interest and allow tracking through the muon beam. The choice of these particular
leptons is based on the data collected, especially in relation to the ability of the “telepathic” signal to
penetrate passive defenses, and the fact that through it, one can imagine a process of active reading,
which is theoretically working.
By combining the reading of the target’s verbal thoughts with the writing of a voice on his hearing, it is
possible to achieve “telepathic” bidirectional communication between the operators and the target.
Unfortunately, these operators are psychologists-manipulators and the established relationship
reinforced by other forms of non-consensual neurostimulation shown in the diagram allows to complete
the picture of a genuine system of remote mind control based on “artificial telepathy”.
Should lepton hypotheses prove to be unfounded, the framework of the system described would, in any
case, remain the first independent technical analysis of a remote mind control system. At present, the
data available do not allow for the formulation of new hypotheses about the remote mind control
system in use.
In-depth studies and further experiments on the subject-matter of the article have led to a revision of
the lepton hypothesis, which covers solely the neutrinos as a carrier of interaction. The absence of
delays perceptible during a “telepathic” communication and the ability of the system tracking a target
that moves at the speed of an air line without interrupting the communication itself, suggest the
existence of a feedback loop consisting of all particles moving at the speed of light. Moreover, the
continuing “telepatic” communication even under ground, sheltered from the mass of a whole
mountain, testifies the extreme penetration capacity of the carrier in question that is well combined
with the properties of neutrinos themselves. Finally, it has been verified that very intense magnetic
fields do not deflect the particles of the carrier, which are thus electrically neutral. A more thorough
discussion is made problematical by the fact that the experimental properties of a neutrino beam of an
intensity which is sufficient enough to implement a system of neuroimaging and neurostimulation are
3. Ten reasons to fight the New World Order.
An article by Andrea Giotti, 19 October 2011.
Adapted and translated by Rudy Andria with the author’s permission.
The mere existence of “artificial telepathy”, that is, a new technology that can read and interpret the
electrical activity of the human brain in terms of words and images from a significant distance, is
sufficient to outline a disturbing scenario for the future of the whole humanity. The fact that this same
technology can also be used to interfere with the functioning of the human nervous system for
manipulation, torture or elimination purposes, without any defense possibility and without leaving
visible traces, makes this scenario even tragic for all those who care for even just the most basic of
human rights. The fact that this technology is now commonly used by the NSA or any other U.S.
government agency for covert psychological operations all over the world, regardless of any actual
political control and outside any ethical or legal constraints, changes this scenario from a future
possibility into a present terrible reality.
If the development of a new carrier of physical interaction, on which this technology seems to be
based, can meet the general criteria under which you are designing a new secret weapon, why apply it
to the reading and writing of human brain’s cortical currents? Which design hides such an obviously
wicked choice? Which political culture, or lack thereof, characterizes the executives who have the use
of it anywhere on the planet? In order to attempt an answer to these questions it is appropriate to
examine the impact that this technology will have on the future world.
A first effect of the existence of this technology is the partial destruction of anyone’s freedom of
thought. In fact, if even only some of the most secret thoughts of every human being become accessible
from the outside, it is no longer only their expression which is to be subject to control and possible
repression but directly its deep origin. For the first time in history, the “master’s voice” eventually
replaces that of the inner consciousness to influence its own choices. In this context, a very effective
censorship may prevent the emergence of any form of dissent against the new order which is trying to
impose itself. It is furthermore noted that freedom of thought is the basis of any other personal freedom
and that undermining it even partially means making man a slave from the outset.
A second effect of the existence of this technology is the complete destruction of anyone’s privacy,
resulting in blackmail of any public figure. None of them lives a completely transparent life and the
inevitable gap between the public and private aspects of all life becomes fully exploited by those who
hold the monopoly of such a technology. Each individual activity, including sex, is then carried out
under the constant threat of being in the spotlight and no secrets can no longer be protected, even those
of the state. The new world that is emerging on the horizon, will therefore also requires the creation of
a new morality, more pragmatic and less hypocritical in judging one’s neighbour’s vices and the guilts
of the past.
A third effect of the existence of this technology is the complete destruction of anyone’s safety. If you
can be quietly eliminated in your bed, without any medical examination to rule out the possibility of a
natural death, no one is no longer safe. From this point of view, bodyguards, presidential planes, fallout
shelters do not guarantee to the most powerful ones among human beings more than what is guaranteed
to the last of the last citizens. So you do not see how such a framework can be compatible with the
protection of the internal security of any nation or how it is possible to provide guarantees in respect
even to those who should supervise the use of such a technology in a less than direct manner.
A fourth effect of the existence of this technology is the partial destruction of mutual trust among
human beings. Mental voices and physical torture may in fact be used to transform the targeted victim
into a kind of “Manchurian candidate”, without the need to meet him or her in person even once. For
example, if a relative or a neighbour with not too strong a personality can be psychologically
manipulated in such a subtle way, perhaps to gradually get a psychopath murderer acting on
commission, which mutual trust can then still exist among human beings?
A fifth effect of the existence of this technology is the partial destruction of the bases on which our
juridical system is built, since the crimes committed through these new tools are neither demonstrable
nor prosecutable on the state of the facts. With which psychiatric skills will a victim of terrible
oppressions be able to be distinguished from a madman or which postmortem procedures will be able
to be used, in front of an apparently natural death, to rule out a homicide in the future world? Those
responsible thus seem to enjoy total impunity and ultimately be above every law.
A sixth effect of the existence of this technology is the partial destruction of the freedom of scientific
research, given that reproducing the results achieved by the Americans in this field would mean undermining their
strategic advantage and probably triggering a war. In the picture that has been outlined, nobody can be
allowed even a full comprehension of the physical and neurological bases on which such a technology
relies, since they might be used to design a detector or even a defense device, and the scientists who do
research for correlated issues remain figures with very high risk.
A seventh effect of the existence of this technology is the complete destruction of the very concept of
national sovereignty, as no frontier can hinder the new carrier of physical interaction that likely acts as
the basis for this application. Heads of state, ministers and parliamentarians from around the world will
not, of course, have more immunity than their American colleagues, nor will the military or intelligence
officers responsible for protecting the institutions represented by the first be in a better position. A
world finally united, but in whose hands?
An eighth effect of the existence of this technology is the complete destruction of the supervisory
mechanism based on popular consensus that, although with great difficulty, characterizes democratic
states. The mere fact that the owners of this new power are completely hidden and rigidly framed in a
top-down hierarchy, detached from effective political control, makes them substantially unaccountable
to public opinion. This is not the first time that this has happened in history, but for the first time the
entire planet is likely to be run by a kind of technocratic elite with unconstrained mandate.
A ninth effect of the existence of this technology is the complete destruction of the principle of
citizenship, which is gradually replaced by that of subjection. The culture of the leaders of the structure
that manages this new weapon seems to be based on the dual concepts of domination / submission,
rather than on the distinction between allies and adversaries, and cannot conceive the negotiation as a
tool for the resolution of disputes. The goal that arises is in fact that of an absolute control over our
A tenth effect of the existence of this technology is the possible end of the world that we know, because
despite the huge power it confers and its maximum secrecy, its use in order to impose an absolute
dominance on the world is somewhat unrealistic. Russia and China, and not to forget Europe, will not
just stand idly by and watch and a possible future scenario is that of a nuclear holocaust when the
leaders of one of these nations had to be silently eliminated “for national security reasons”.
Someone in the United States has uncovered the Pandora’s Box and places on all free men the
responsibility of putting the cover back in its place, if this is still possible. It is urgent that the U.S.
President officially announces to the world the existence of this new technology and that he commits
himself to a unilateral moratorium on its use, both on U.S. soil and in the rest of the world.
Negotiations are then necessary at the highest level between the major powers to extend the
moratorium to the development of similar technologies by any other people and the establishment of an
international agency responsible for ensuring the compliance with such a moratorium.
From its part, public opinion can claim to know the truth, protest, show civil disobedience and exploit
the power of information to prevent this process of progressive emptying of our institutions from
passing in silence.
All this is necessary, but it might not be quite sufficient to prevent further scientific developments from
drawing a future in which each personal freedom ends up being suppressed by even more capillary
mass mind control techniques. As substantially self-referential the power that holds today’s technology
is bound to an involution that will lead to paranoia and is likely doomed to collapse, torn to pieces by
internal fights, but with the risk nevertheless of leaving behind the ruins of a world.
Andrea Giotti has a Bachelor’s degree in information engineering from Florence
University. He also holds a Ph.D. in information and telecommunications engineering
from the same university and the specialization diploma for the teaching of mathematics
in Italian high schools from the universities of Florence, Pisa and Siena. In the meantime
he has carried out several activities, among which software development for design as an
analyst programmer. He currently serves as a teacher in an Italian high school in the province of
Pistoia. He has several interests, among which scientific literature, cinema and songwriters’ songs.
His e-mail address is
and his Facebook page is
For further search and discussions you may consult the Facebook discussion group:
or the sites: